Vespula Avionics Module Wiki

Under construction

These notes are being tightened as final screenshots, measurements, and layout callouts are added.

Purpose

The Vespula Avionics Module is the flight engine controller for vehicle actuation and engine-related sensing. It runs from the 48 V avionics bus, commands solenoid valves and igniters, and reads RTDs, pressure transducers, and differential sensors used during engine start and shutdown.

My Responsibility

I was the Revision Responsible Engineer. I inherited the first revision, audited the schematic and interfaces, found critical design faults, implemented the schematic and PCB revision, led bring-up, and became the board's day-to-day operational owner.

Initial Design Problems

Review and bring-up of the inherited design exposed a few real issues:

These were system-level problems, not isolated assembly defects, so fixing them meant coordinating schematic, pin-map, firmware-interface, and PCB changes together.

Revision Strategy

The redesign started by rebuilding signal ownership at the controller and vehicle connectors. Boot-sensitive pins were removed from conflicting functions, ADC polarity was corrected, and the controller pin map was brought back in line with the intended engine-control interfaces.

The igniter converter and its compensation were revised to restore stable power behavior. High-current output paths and low-level sensor interfaces were then reviewed together to ensure that the electrical changes remained valid in the PCB layout.

PCB Layout

The six-layer layout separates valve and igniter current paths from RTD, pressure-transducer, and differential-sensor circuitry. The power layer supports actuation-current distribution, while adjacent reference planes provide return continuity for sensor and controller signals.

Featured layout callouts should identify:

Bring-Up

Bring-up started with controller boot behavior and regulated rails before progressing to ADC polarity, sensor scaling, valve outputs, and igniter operation.

The corrected revision restored reliable controller startup, valid sensor acquisition, and repeatable actuation behavior. That was the important milestone: the board became usable flight and test hardware, not just a schematic cleanup.

Engineering Lesson

The most important part of the project was not any one circuit correction. It was building a disciplined way to audit an inherited design across schematic intent, processor pin behavior, PCB routing, firmware assumptions, and actual bench measurements.

Next Revision

Future work should add more explicit converter-loop test access, improve labeling around boot-sensitive signals, and capture controller pin ownership in a single interface-control table shared between electrical and firmware teams.